CostingUpdated 3 min readBy the CostmatiQ team

Design to cost: savings that start at the drawing board

Design choices shape much of a part's cost. How design to cost and DFM use should-cost early to question tolerances, features and materials.

Engineers' hands holding printed CAD drawings of a part over a workbench with tools.
Photo: ThisisEngineering, Unsplash

Key takeaways

  • Much of a part's cost is set by design choices, long before it is spent in production.
  • DFM checks whether a design can be made efficiently; design to cost checks what it will cost.
  • Tolerances, features and material choices are the usual cost drivers to question.
  • A shared should-cost model lets design, purchasing and manufacturing discuss the same numbers.

By the time a purchasing team negotiates a price, much of the cost has already been shaped. It was shaped when an engineer chose a tolerance, a feature, a material and, implicitly, a process.

Cost is committed before it is spent

Cost committed rises early in design; cost spent rises later in production.

Qualitative illustration of a widely used principle, not measured data: design choices commit cost long before it is spent.

Negotiation can move a price within the room the design leaves. Design decisions move the room itself.

What drives cost in a design

  • Tolerances. A tighter tolerance than the function needs can add operations, slower cycles or inspection.
  • Features. Deep pockets, thin walls, undercuts and small radii can force slower processes or more complex tools.
  • Material. Grade, form and blank size set the material line and often the process.
  • Process fit. A part designed for one process but made with another rarely costs what it should.

A pencil pointing at tolerance callouts on a technical drawing, next to a scale ruler.

Tight tolerances and extra features on the drawing turn into machine time and inspection. Photo: Sven Mieke, Unsplash.

DFM and design to cost together

DFM asks: can this be made efficiently? Design to cost asks: what will it cost, and what would cost less? Used together on a should-cost model, they let a design review compare alternatives in money, not opinion.

How to run it

  1. Cost the concept as soon as there is a model.
  2. Identify the top cost drivers and the design choices behind them.
  3. Propose alternatives (material, geometry, process) and cost each.
  4. Review with design, purchasing and manufacturing together, and agree a target.

Questions to ask in a design review

  • Which tolerance is tighter than the function needs? Each one can add an operation or inspection.
  • Which feature forces a slower or more complex process? Deep pockets, undercuts, thin walls and small radii are common culprits.
  • Is the material specified by function or by habit? A different grade or form can change both the material and the process line.
  • Is the part designed for the process it will be made with? A casting designed like a machined part, or a pressing designed like a casting, rarely costs what it should.
  • What would the part cost at the target volume? Tooling and process choices change with volume.

Two engineers reviewing a coloured CAD model of a moulded plastic part on a monitor.

Cost questions belong in the design review, while the geometry can still change. Photo: Kumpan Electric, Unsplash.

Making it a habit

Design to cost works best as a routine, not a project: a should-cost at each design gate, the top cost drivers listed, and one or two alternatives costed for each. Over time the rates and models become a shared reference for design, purchasing and manufacturing.

The same model supports later negotiation: see what is should-costing, or the DFM and design-to-cost service.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between DFM and design to cost?

DFM (design for manufacturing) asks whether a part can be made efficiently and reliably. Design to cost adds the price: what each design choice costs and which alternatives would cost less.

When should design to cost start?

As early as there is a concept model. The earlier a cost driver is spotted, the cheaper it is to change.

Does design to cost mean lower quality?

No. It removes cost that does not add value: an unnecessary tolerance, a hard-to-make feature, an over-specified material. Function and quality requirements stay fixed.

Related serviceDFM & design to costWhat the design costs, and what to change.

Start with three of your parts.

Plastic, sheet metal and PCBA. Cost report, gap analysis and levers in four weeks.